Who is accusing father corapi

New survey raises concerns about increasingly conservative clergy Nov 12, Classroom questions and answers on God and life's fairness Nov 12, Berlin archbishop to name minister for gays, calls sidelining 'painful' Aug 10, Las Cruces lawmaker says politics led to denial of Communion Jul 20, Abuse allegation against retired Buffalo auxiliary under investigation Jul 14, Pope Francis goes to Rome hospital for intestinal surgery Jul 4, Email address.

More Like This. Catholics concerned for the plight of Father John Corapi should have a look at an important essay in this debate. The priesthood scandal emerged out of Boston just weeks after the terrorist attacks of September 11, Bishops have not been immune to the reactionary hard line on a national scale that has prevailed ever since. Just a year earlier, in November, , the U. As a prisoner, I was much moved by the courageous Gospel truths within that document.

They wrote of the inherent injustice of mandatory sentences with rigid formulations that have crept in to replace the discretion of judges dealing with individual cases in the justice system. I cheered our bishops on. Since then, other voices have compromised those ideals with the rhetoric of a witch-hunt. In , the U. Good-Bye, Good Priest! Father John Corapi's Kafkaesque Catch Gordon MacRae. Jun 22 Written By Fr.

The case of Fr. John Corapi spotlights a serious flaw in restrictions imposed on accused Catholic priests: an unintended denial of basic civil liberties. The resultant damage to the accused is immediate, irreparable, and serious, especially for someone like myself, since I am so well known.

First Name. Last Name. How many souls will now will leave the Church and be lost out of misguided loyalty to what appears to be a false prophet? As the old Latin saying goes: Corruptio optimi pessima. We are first and foremost Christians and nobody is more important than Christ or his Church. It is human nature to latch on to those personalities who "tell it like it is" or say what we like to hear.

Nonetheless, as the article demonstrates, there have been plenty of "warning signs. Our Lord told the apostles to "watch and pray" in the Garden. It is so important to direct our intellects and wills properly. I would be very interested to hear anyone's hypothesis as to how Fr. Corapi's ministry was able to bear so much good fruit IF he was indeed living in sin. While some of the criticisms of Father Corapi's recent actions are valid,I would not yet assume that Father Corapi is guilty of all of the above charges until he has had his day in court.

I have heard that when corporate management people are terminated, it is often par for the course to have them sign broadly framed non-disclosure agreements to not speak critically of the corporation as a condition for receiving a termination settlement.

I would wait longer to draw any definite conclusions. Essential to continue in Your gift will be matched! Corapi: Why were warning signs ignored? Read more Next post ». Sound Off! Posted by: AgnesDay - Jul. Posted by: EiLL - Jul. Posted by: New Sister - Jul. Posted by: Bill in IL - Jul. Either he is mad or he has a case, lets let the jury decide Posted by: polish.

Posted by: - Jul. Posted by: Sed contra - Jul. What I wonder now is if Father Corapi has actually seen the letter, or merely been made aware of what the letter said. His lawsuit would seem to be without any merit if it turns out that the letter was not written by the defendant, but by another party who was perhaps familiar with the circumstances.

So will the evidence include an actual copy of the letter, and who wrote the letter? I still believe this is all a pack of lies trumped up by the Lavender Mafia, because they hate orthodoxy. And the word of Bishop Gracida and Fr.

Corapi to file this suit knowing the full details. After looking at P35 with its reference to his priestly faculties, I would wonder what bearing there might be if it were to turn out he had been previously acting without priestly faculties. As he lived outside of his community for years and apparently they had made efforts for him to return to community , it would seem he should have been required to obtain faculties from the diocese of Helena where he resided as per Canon He had indicated that the majority of his work did not require faculties which was not entirely true since his preaching as a priest at church sanctioned events should have required faculties , so if it were to turn out that he had already been getting by improperly without faculties was he truly damaged by the accusations??

Quite a bit of money for a person who professed the evangelical councils. I was under the impression that he had to have the Ordinaries permission to come to a diocese, at least that is what Fr told me in when I saw him in New York. Stunning is the sinfulness. You are soooo going to need it, even if he is guilty. Going to Mass now… I have actually remained involved in this whole thing on Facebook and his blog and can still receive Communion in a state of grace.

You and the NCR members are still guilty of deliberate, malicious, gravely sinful acts. And you continue to do it suggesting utterly no remorse and no firm purpose of amendment. National Formerly Catholic Register.

And communicated to him via Fr. This is sad indeed. When one of us falls, we all go down hard. We are all suffering here. Faithful Catholics everywhere have to lick these wounds…again. This is yet another scandal we have to find a way to explain to our children and pray they understand. Akin, I have had great respect for you for many years. Please consider that your posts and writings on this matter may not have been done with all the charity, delicacy and sensitivity needed. I humbly as you do what you can from this day to help the Church through this very difficult time.

John Vianney, pray for us! Our Lady of Grace, pray for us! Michael the archangel, protect us from the enemy! God Bless you. Dan: Faculties are not granted on an event by event basis. Father needs to have been incardinated and not just for a day in a diocese or with SOLT. Canon indicates that a member of a Society of Apostolic Life cannot live outside his community beyond a few years, and if he does he must report to the bishop of the diocese in which he resides.

The diocese of Helena indicates that he has no faculties with the diocese, and he has lived outside of SOLT for well beyond a few years. If SOLT put out a public statement claiming there were emails and texts of an inappropriate nature, I imagine they have documented those emails and texts and traced them to their sources, and verified that the sources are accurate. Stupid is as stupid does. But the fun kind. Ta, cupcake. Maybe the priesthood will take you. An opportunity to practice Charity.

And, as St. Paul wrote, to heap red-hot coals on its head. Respectfully, could you please take the PDF down. Corapi in person twice over the years, and have been greatly edified by his teaching ministry. Assuming that is true, then that gives Fr. Corapi something substantial to address if in fact that evidence does not indicate what is claimed, or is bogus.

One advantage do we have in the Catholic Church is that there are multiple levels of appeal, all the way up to the Holy Father if necessary. If such allegations were brought against the pastor of a non-denominational congregation, there is no court of appeal other than a secular one. This warning applies to all those who are persecuting Fr.

Corapi if he is innocent, but it also applies to Fr. Corapi if he is guilty and is refusing to obey his legitimate authorities in these matters. Could some one of those adamantly defending Corapi please explain what motivation the SOLT would have to defame its marquee apostle and likely its greatest source of income?

Even St. Thomas More got to make a perjurer of his accuser. The tragedy of the situation is that whether the allegations are true or false, but particularly if they are true, the accuser and SOLT have made Corapi a victim.

There should be no closet whence to out her. She must put up or shut up, and since the damage is now done, the latter is off the table. Especially SOLT; they not only go against their own doctrine to not speak aloud of internal affairs, but do so, and well. The behaviors of really all parties in this ordeal is disgusting. God bless our holy catholic and apostolic church. The church is fine — the people are screwed up. Simon: Father knows the name as this was filed on his behalf. The question then is does the whole world have a right to know, or simply Father Corapi?

This whole incident has been unedifying from start to beginning. The matter is now a scandal and makes me realise what difficult times we live in. But for a consecrated son of the Holy Church to indulge in such behavior…well then it is no wonder the sheep are leaving the Church disillusioned and in despair.

In England at that time, the accuser got anonymity, but the accused did not. That experience seared into me from a very early age as a moral lesson what I have since learned as an intellectual lesson: A system can justly reveal both names, or neither name, but it cannot justly be asymmetrical, and when a public figure is accused, full disclosure is the only possibility.

Hi, Jimmy! Thanks for the interview with Al Kresta on the radio. The difference? He is a nobody. But, when you put yourself out there as a mantle of orthodoxy and the second most demanded Catholic speaker in the Country you have the opportunity to lead many many… astray, both before and after. More, perhaps, after as people blindly defend the indefensible. Once you have put yourself in the position that Fr. Prayer is obvious.

I find it odd the agreement that was entered into. Note that this is asking for a jury trial — imagine that! First, anyone who loves the church has to be troubled by this episode.

No matter the outcome, the church will suffer yet another blow to her moral authority at a time when such authority is clearly needed.